08 LC 29
3012
House
Resolution 1071
By:
Representatives Benfield of the
85th,
Ralston of the
7th,
Mumford of the
95th,
Mangham of the
94th,
Levitas of the
82nd,
and others
A
RESOLUTION
Urging
all law enforcement agencies of this state to develop and implement written
policies for conducting showups, photographic lineups, and physical lineups
setting forth the manner in which these operations shall be conducted; and for
other purposes.
WHEREAS,
eyewitness error is the leading cause of mistaken convictions, and cases of
mistaken convictions in this state due to eyewitness misidentification have
resulted in actual perpetrators remaining free to commit more crimes;
and
WHEREAS,
the goal of a police investigation is to identify accurately and apprehend the
true perpetrators of crimes, and scientific studies of eyewitness memory have
demonstrated that eyewitness evidence is, like trace physical evidence,
susceptible to contamination if not handled properly; and
WHEREAS,
well-intentioned witnesses and authorities acting in good faith may sometimes
inadvertently undermine the accuracy of an identification procedure unless
appropriate safeguards are in place; and
WHEREAS,
extensive scientific research has shown that alternative methods of conducting
identification procedures greatly enhance eyewitness identification accuracy;
and
WHEREAS,
this state has a compelling interest in assuring that appropriate eyewitness
identification procedures are utilized in this state; and
WHEREAS,
the House Study Committee on Eyewitness Identification Procedures recently
completed a study of issues pertaining to witness identification and the use of
various lineup procedures; and
WHEREAS,
the House Study Committee on Eyewitness Identification Procedures developed
guidelines and procedures which should be contained in written policies, as
follows: (1) Prior to conducting a photographic lineup or physical lineup, all
witnesses should be separated from each other. Witnesses should not be allowed
to confer with each other before, during, or after the identification
procedure.
(2)
It is strongly encouraged that the administrator of a photographic lineup or
physical lineup should be a neutral independent administrator, and no person
familiar with the identity of the suspect should be present during a
photographic lineup or physical lineup.
(3)
When it is not feasible to have a photographic lineup or physical lineup
administered by a neutral independent administrator, an alternative method may
be used, and the administrator should exercise extreme caution to avoid
inadvertent signaling to the witness of the administrator´s preferred
response. Alternative methods may include:
(A)
Automated computer programs that can automatically administer the photographic
lineup directly to a witness and prevent the administrator from seeing which
photograph the witness is viewing until after the procedure is completed;
or
(B)
A procedure in which photographs are placed in folders, randomly numbered,
shuffled, and then presented to a witness such that the administrator cannot see
or track which photograph is being presented to the witness until after the
photographic lineup is completed.
(4)
Photographic lineups and physical lineups should be conducted in a manner that
promotes the reliability, fairness, and objectivity of the witness´s
identification.
(5)
Simultaneous photographic lineup or physical lineup procedures where photographs
or individuals are shown at the same time or sequential photographic lineup or
physical lineup procedures where photographs or individuals are shown to the
witness one at a time may be used. If a simultaneous photographic lineup or
physical lineup procedure is utilized, it shall be administered by a neutral
independent administrator.
(6)
Each witness should be shown all photographs or individuals even if such witness
makes an identification during the photographic lineup or physical
lineup.
(7)
Each witness should be asked to give feedback in his or her own words regarding
his or her level of confidence in the identification.
(8)
Composition of photographic lineups and physical lineups should meet the
following requirements:
(A)
Only one member of a photographic lineup or physical lineup should be a suspect,
and the remainder should be fillers;
(B)
If the witness has previously viewed a photographic lineup or physical lineup in
connection with the investigation of the crime, the fillers in any subsequent
photographic lineup or physical lineup should be different from the fillers used
in any prior lineup;
(C)
The fillers selected should generally fit the witness´s description of the
perpetrator at the time of the crime, especially with respect to any unique or
significant features; and
(D)
In addition to the suspect, at least five fillers should be included in a
photographic lineup, and at least four fillers should be included in a physical
lineup.
(9)
Prior to beginning a photographic lineup or physical lineup identification
procedure, the administrator should instruct the witness that:
(A)
The witness does not have to make an identification, and the identification
procedure is important to the investigation whether or not an identification is
made;
(B)
The individuals depicted in the photographic lineup or physical lineup may not
appear exactly as the witness observed on the date of the crime because features
such as hairstyles and facial hair are subject to change;
(C)
The perpetrator may or may not be among those shown in the photographic lineup
or physical lineup;
(D)
When a neutral independent administrator is conducting the photographic lineup
or physical lineup, the administrator is not aware of whether the suspect is
included in such photographic lineup or physical lineup; and
(E)
Regardless of whether an identification is made, law enforcement will continue
to investigate the crime.
(10)
When conducting a photographic lineup or physical lineup, the administrator
should preserve the outcome of the procedure by documenting any identification
or nonidentification result obtained from a witness. All witness responses to
the photographic lineup or physical lineup participants should be documented
using the witness´s own words, either in writing or with an audio or video
recording.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY that all law enforcement
agencies of this state are strongly urged to develop and implement written
policies for conducting showups, photographic lineups, and physical lineups
setting forth the manner in which these operations shall be
conducted.
BE
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the House of Representatives is authorized
and directed to transmit appropriate copies of this resolution to the Georgia
Sheriff´s Association, the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police, the
Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and the Georgia Peace Officer Standards and
Training Council.
